Deindividuation in Student Organization Cadre Building

Authors

  • Muhammad Iqbal Department of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Ahmad Department of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia

Keywords:

Deindividuation, Group Norms, Orientation, Student Organizations

Abstract

Orientation is something that is often encountered during college. Antinormative and negative behaviors that arise in orientation can have a negative impact on the parties involved, so it is important to know the causes and solutions. This study aims to reveal the role of deindividuation and group norms in influencing student behavior when conducting orientation, including antinormative behavior. The research method used is qualitative with a phenomenological approach. The data collection technique used in this study was through interviews conducted to respondents who met the criteria. The respondents of this study consisted of three people, namely E, S, A, and T. The results showed that the influence of tradition and group norms made orientation a suitable place for the emergence of deindividuation. The factors that encourage the emergence of deindividuation are the presence of a sense of anonymity, both internal and external, in the orientation implementers, the influence of group norms on the implementation of orientation, and the reduced sense of accountability and responsibility of the orientation implementers on the consequences of their behavior. The results of this study can be a source of information in optimizing and improving the orientation system of student organizations and making policies that can reduce the emergence of antinormative behavior in the orientation of student organizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Sommers, S. R. (2020). Social Psychology Global Edition (10th ed.). Pearson.

Baron, R. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2011). Social Psychology 13th Ed. In Pearson.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=DLbBDQAAQBAJ

Daft, R. L. (2010). Organization Theory and Design (10th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.

Femelia, Y. (2017). Pola Pengkaderan Partai Kebangkitan Bangsa (PKB) Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Berpolitik (Study pada DPC Partai Kebangkitan Bangsa Kota Bandar Lampung) [UIN Raden Intan Lampung]. http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/1179/

Huda, M. N. (2022). Optimalisasi Manajemen SDM Dalam Meningkatkan Sistem Pengkaderan. Ta’dibi : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 10(2). http://e-jurnal.stail.ac.id/index.php/tadibi/article/view/408

Irmawati, & Purba, R. M. (2018). Proses Kelompok: Pengaruh Dalam Kelompok Sosial . In Ardiningtiyas, Z. Abidin, & M. N. Milla (Eds.), Psikologi Sosial: Pengantar dalam Teori dan Penelitian (pp. 147–169). Salemba Humanika.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Pedoman Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Organisasi Kemahasiswaan – Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Kemendikbudristek. https://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/pengumuman/pedoman-pelaksanaan-kegiatan-organisasi-kemahasiswaan/

Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 46 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pencegahan dan Penanganan Kekerasan di Lingkungan Satuan Pendidikan (46 Tahun 2023). Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/sjdih/siperpu/ dokumen/salinan/salinan_20230808_132250_2023pmkemdikbudristek46.pdf

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=JFN_BwAAQBAJ

Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123(3), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.3.238

Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 918.

Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.503

Republik Indonesia. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Pasal 351 Tentang Penganiayaan & Ancaman Hukumannya. Diakses pada 1 Desember, 2023, from https://pid.kepri.polri.go.id/bunyi-dan-makna-pasal-351-kuhp-tentang-penganiayaan/

Ridelvi. (2017). Peran Organisasi Eksternal Kemahasiswaan Terhadap Keterampilan Berkomunikasi Mahasiswa Di Kampus (Studi terhadap Para Aktivis HMI, PMII & IMM di IAIN SMH Banten). http://repository.uinbanten.ac.id/id/eprint/1293

Spears, R. (2016). Deindividuation (S. G. Harkins, K. D. Williams, & J. Burger, Eds.; Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199859870.013.25

Spears, R. (2017). Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects (pp. 1–9). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0091

Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 427–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365094021004001

Universitas Negeri Makassar. (2017). Peraturan Kemahasiswaan Universitas Negeri Makassar, Pub. L. No. 1406/UN36/KM/2017

Published

2024-05-08

Issue

Section

Articles